Lower Extremity Motor Deficits Are Underappreciated in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Added Value of Objective Outcome Measures.

OBJECTIVE: The patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)-based evaluation in lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) is today's gold standard but has limitations. We studied the impact of lower extremity motor deficits (LEMDs) on PROMs and a new objective outcome measure. METHODS: We evaluated patients with lumbar DDD from a prospective 2-center database. LEMDs were graded according to the British Medical Research Council (BMRC; 5 [normal] -0 [no movement]). The PROM-based evaluation included pain (visual analogue scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] & Roland-Morris Disability Index [RMDI]), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Short-Form 12 physical component summary/mental component summary & EuroQol-5D index). Objective functional impairment (OFI) was determined as age- and sex-adjusted Timed-Up and Go (TUG) test value. RESULTS: One hundred five of 375 patients (28.0%) had a LEMD. Patients with LEMD had slightly higher disability (ODI: 52.8 vs. 48.2, p = 0.025; RMDI: 12.6 vs. 11.3, p = 0.034) but similar pain and HRQoL scores. OFI T-scores were significantly higher in patients with LEMD (144.2 vs. 124.3, p = 0.006). When comparing patients with high- (BMRC 0-2) vs. low-grade LEMD (BMRC 3-4), no difference was evident for the PROM-based evaluation (all p > 0.05) but patients with high-grade LEMD had markedly higher OFI T-scores (280.9 vs. 136.0, p = 0.001). Patients with LEMD had longer TUG test times and OFI T-scores than matched controls without LEMDs. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that PROMs fail to sufficiently account for LEMD-associated disability, which is common and oftentimes bothersome to patients. The objective functional evaluation with the TUG test appears to be more sensitive to LEMD-associated disability. An objective functional evaluation of patients with LEMD appears reasonable.

Endoscope-Assisted Extreme-Lateral Interbody Fusion: Preliminary Experience and Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: The extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) technique is safe and effective; however, the deep and tight surgical corridor makes visual identification of important landmark structures, as well as sufficient endplate and contralateral preparation, challenging. In the present study, we analyzed the safety and feasibility of endoscope-assisted (EA) XLIF procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study on consecutive patients undergoing XLIF procedures between February 2014 and July 2016. EA-XLIF and conventional XLIF (c-XLIF) procedures were compared in terms of the duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), perioperative and postoperative complications, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (mean age, 66.7 years ± 10.0 years; 22 males [53.7%]) underwent a XLIF procedure, including 6 (14.6%) who underwent EA-XLIF. EA-XLIF did not increase the duration of surgery or EBL. No perioperative or postoperative complications were observed in any of the EA-XLIF procedures. Clinical and radiologic outcomes at 6 weeks postsurgery and at the last follow-up (mean, 8.0 ± 5.8 months postsurgery) were similar for patients in the EA-XLIF and c-XLIF groups. The EA-XLIF technique was considered particularly helpful for checking the lumbar plexus anatomy on the psoas surface, identifying the relationship between the peritoneum and the psoas muscle, positioning the shim into the disc space, removing the disk, and checking the quality of contralateral release and endplate preparation. CONCLUSIONS: The EA-XLIF technique is safe and may be considered as an adjunct procedure, offering improved visualization to guide the surgeon in key steps of the XLIF procedure.

Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): A single-center clinical and radiological follow-up study of 20 patients.

Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) is an alternative to standard posterior approaches for achieving fusion in the lumbar spine. It allows exposure of the lateral aspect of the lumbar disc through a lateral approach with the possibility to insert a wide footprint interbody cage as a stand-alone procedure or associated with a uni- or bilateral percutaneous fixation. This is a retrospective series of 20 consecutive patients operated with a XLIF procedure from 2014 to 2015. N=10 women and N=10 men with a mean age of 67.5years (range 37.9-81.2) were included in the study. N=18 patients have been operated at one level, while N=2 patients underwent a double-level XLIF. The index levels were: L2-L3 in 2, L3-L4 in 7, L4-L5 in 9 and L3-L5 in 2 patients, respectively. The mean clinico-radiological follow-up was 9.8months (range 2.5-16.6). The clinical outcome was assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Euro-Qol (EQ)-5D, visual analogue scale (VAS) and EQ-5D index scores. Preoperative, postoperative and follow-up sagittal balance was assessed by EOS full spine X-ray. Furthermore, presence or absence of fusion was assessed by thin cuts CT scan at the end of the follow-up. The analysis highlighted a clear clinical improvement for the study collective. The mean ODI improved from 41.6 preoperatively to 23.5 at the last follow-up (p<0.0036). EQ-5D VAS and EQ-5D index improved from 45.5 to 71.8 (p<0.0001) and from 0.454 to 0.693 (p<0.0002), respectively. Analysis of the sagittal balance revealed an increase of the total lumbar lordosis, however not in a statistically significant manner (p=0.164). Furthermore, an increase of 55.7% in mean disc height (from 7.0mm to 10.9mm) has been observed (p<0.0001). Surprisingly, the right foramen height was increased in a statistically significant manner compared to the left one, but both of them increased in absolute values. However, foraminal area on both sides did not significantly increase. The mean canal area was 115.7mm2 preoperatively and 136.5mm2 at follow-up (p=0.1325). Radiological fusion was observed in every case at the end of the follow-up period. The XLIF procedure accomplishes a secure and effective interbody fusion. This approach allows for an indirect decompression of neural structures by restoring foramen dimensions and disc space height, leading to an improvement of symptoms. Furthermore, XLIF seems to improve segmental sagittal balance.

Unruptured intracranial aneurysm follow-up and treatment after morphological change is safe: observational study and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The management of small unruptured incidentally discovered intracranial aneurysms (SUIAs) is still controversial. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of a management protocol of SUIAs, where selected cases with SUIAs are observed and secured only if signs of instability (growth) are documented. METHODS: A prospective consecutive cohort of 292 patients (2006-2014) and 368 SUIAs (anterior circulation aneurysms (ACs) smaller than 7 mm and posterior circulation aneurysms smaller than 4 mm without previous subarachnoid haemorrhage) was observed (mean follow-up time of 3.2 years and 1177.6 aneurysm years). Factors associated with aneurysm growth were systematically reviewed from the literature. RESULTS: The aneurysm growth probability was 2.6±0.1% per year. The rate of unexpected aneurysm rupture before treatment was 0.24% per year (95% CI 0.17% to 2.40%). The calculated rate of aneurysm rupture after growth was 6.3% per aneurysm-year (95% CI 1% to 22%). Aneurysms located in the posterior circulation and aneurysms with lobulation were more likely to grow. Females or patients suffering hypertension were more likely to have an aneurysm growing. The probability of aneurysms growth increased with the size of the dome and was proportional to the number of aneurysms diagnosed in a patient. CONCLUSIONS: It is safe to observe patients diagnosed with SUIAs using periodic imaging. Intervention to secure the aneurysm should be performed after growth is observed.

Health-related quality of life following spinal cordectomy for syringomyelia.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cordectomy has been described as an effective treatment option in paraplegic patients for the treatment of syringomyelia to manage spasticity, pain and ascending neurological dysfunction. The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after cordectomy in patients with intractable symptoms caused by syringomyelia. METHODS: Seventeen patients underwent spinal cordectomy for syringomyelia between February 2000 and July 2009. The etiology of syringomyelia was traumatic in 16 patients and spinal ependymoma in one patient. The mean follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 0.9-10.3). The HRQoL was assessed pre- and postoperatively using the EuroQol (EQ; degree of discomfort: 1 = none, 2 = moderate and 3 = extreme) and the short-form SF-36 quality of life score (SF-36). All patients underwent a telephone interview. RESULTS: The mean pre- and postoperative EuroQol-levels for mobility were 1.8 and 1.5; for self-care, 1.9 and 1.5; for usual activities, 2.1 and 1.5; for pain/discomfort, 2.3 and 2.0; and for anxiety/depression, 1.7 and 1.5, respectively. The mean overall EQ visual analogue scale improved postoperatively from 42 points (range, 15-80) to 67 points (range, 10-95) (p = 0.006). The component summary measure for mental health (SF-36) significantly improved postoperatively (p = 0.01). A telephone interview revealed a high subjective patient satisfactory (94.1%) in terms of postoperative sequelae. Following the intervention, 58.8% of all patients were employed full or part-time. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cordectomy may increase the quality of life and can be considered as an ultimo ratio therapy in a selective group of patients with intractable symptoms caused by syringomyelia.